<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<modsCollection xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:slims="http://slims.web.id" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd">
<mods version="3.3" id="59062">
 <titleInfo>
  <title>The Use of QLRBP and MLLPQ as Feature Extractors Combined with SVM and kNN Classifiers for Gender Recognition</title>
 </titleInfo>
 <name type="Personal Name" authority="">
  <namePart>Abednego Septian</namePart>
  <role>
   <roleTerm type="text">Primary Author</roleTerm>
  </role>
 </name>
 <typeOfResource manuscript="no" collection="yes">mixed material</typeOfResource>
 <genre authority="marcgt">bibliography</genre>
 <originInfo>
  <place>
   <placeTerm type="text">Bandung</placeTerm>
   <publisher>ITB Journal Publisher</publisher>
   <dateIssued>2021</dateIssued>
  </place>
 </originInfo>
 <language>
  <languageTerm type="code">e</languageTerm>
  <languageTerm type="text">English</languageTerm>
 </language>
 <physicalDescription>
  <form authority="gmd">Artikel Jurnal</form>
  <extent>hlm : 251-264</extent>
 </physicalDescription>
 <relatedItem type="series">
  <titleInfo/>
  <title>Journal of ICT Research and Application</title>
 </relatedItem>
</mods>
<note>&#13;
Abstract&#13;
&#13;
Security systems must be continuously developed in order to cope with new challenges. One example of such challenges is the proliferation of sexual harassment against women in public places, such as public toilets and public transportation. Although separately designated toilets or waiting and seating areas in public transports are provided, enforcing these restrictions need constant manual surveillance. In this paper we propose an automatic gender classification system based on an individual?s facial characteristics. We evaluate the performance of QLRBP and MLLPQ as feature extractors combined with SVM or kNN as classifiers. Our experiments show that MLLPQ gives superior performance compared to QLRBP for either classifier. Furthermore, MLLPQ is less computationally demanding compared to QLRBP. The best result we achieved in our experiments was the combination of MLLPQ and kNN classifier, yielding an accuracy rate of 92.11%.&#13;
</note>
<note type="statement of responsibility"></note>
<subject authority="">
 <topic>Ilmu Teknik</topic>
</subject>
<classification>JICTRA</classification>
<identifier type="isbn">23375787</identifier>
<location>
 <physicalLocation>Perpustakaan Teknik UPI YAI </physicalLocation>
 <shelfLocator>JICTRA  V15N3 December 2021</shelfLocator>
 <holdingSimple>
  <copyInformation>
   <numerationAndChronology type="1">JICTRA6-004</numerationAndChronology>
   <sublocation>Perpustakaan FT UPI YAI</sublocation>
   <shelfLocator>JICTRA  V15N3 December 2021</shelfLocator>
  </copyInformation>
 </holdingSimple>
</location>
<slims:image>JICTRA_ITB_small.png.png</slims:image>
<recordInfo>
 <recordIdentifier>59062</recordIdentifier>
 <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2023-02-15 16:56:12</recordCreationDate>
 <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2023-02-15 16:56:12</recordChangeDate>
 <recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
</recordInfo>
</modsCollection>